Predicting 180-day mortality for women with ovarian cancer using machine learning and patient-reported outcome data

Siegel, R. L., Miller, Okay. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67, 7–30 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herzog, T. J. & Monk, B. J. Bringing new medicines to women with epithelial ovarian cancer: what’s the unmet medical want?. Gynecol. Oncol. Res. Pract. 4, 1–12 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peres, L. C. et al. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancer survival by histotype and illness stage. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 111, 60–68 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Engel, J. et al. Moderate progress for ovarian cancer within the final 20 years: Prolongation of survival, however no enchancment within the treatment fee. Eur. J. Cancer 38, 2435–2445 (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
American Society of Clinical Oncology Institute for Quality. Summary of present QOPI measures.National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Quality of Cancer Care. May 2009. Cancer Care Phase I-II. http://www.qualityforum.org/publications/2009/05/National_voluntary_consensus_standards_for_Quality_%0Aof_Cancer_Care.aspx (2009).Brown, A. J. et al. Missed Opportunities: Patterns of Medical Care and Hospice Utilization Among Ovarian Cancer Patients (Elsevier, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Fauci, J. et al. The Utilization of Palliative Care in Gynecologic Oncology Patients Near the End of Life (Elsevier, 2012).
Google Scholar 
Mullen, M. M. et al. The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Palliative Care Initiative on End of Life Care in Gynecologic Oncology Patients (Elsevier, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Wright, A. A., Hatfield, L. A., Earle, C. C. & Keating, N. L. End-of-life care for older sufferers with ovarian cancer is intensive regardless of excessive charges of hospice use. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 3534–3539 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, A. A. et al. Family views on aggressive cancer care close to the top of life. JAMA 315, 284–292 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wright, A. A. et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, affected person psychological well being, medical care close to demise, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 300, 1665–1673 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Glare, P. et al. A scientific assessment of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally sick cancer sufferers. Br. Med. J. 327, 195–198 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gibbons, C. et al. Routine provision of suggestions from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare suppliers and sufferers in scientific apply. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011589.pub2 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porter, M. What is worth in well being care?. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 2477–2481 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, M.-L. & Lin, C.-C. Cancer symptom clusters: a validation examine. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 34, 590–599 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, P. A. et al. Research digital data seize (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow course of for offering translational analysis informatics assist. J. Biomed. Inform. 42, 377–381 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schalet, B. D., Cook, Okay. F., Choi, S. W. & Cella, D. Establishing a typical metric for self-reported anxiousness: linking the MASQ, PANAS, and GAD-7 to PROMIS anxiousness. J. Anxiety Disord. 28, 88–96 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choi, S. S. W., Schalet, B., Cook, Okay. F. Okay. & Cella, D. Establishing a typical metric for depressive signs: linking the BDI-II, CES-D, and PHQ-9 to PROMIS despair. Psychol. Assess. 26, 513–527 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pilkonis, P. A. et al. Item banks for measuring emotional misery from the patient-reported outcomes measurement info system (PROMIS®): despair, anxiousness, and anger. Assessment 18, 263–283 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y., Chen, P. H. C., Krause, J. & Peng, L. How to learn articles that use machine learning: customers’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.16489 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cohen, J. F. et al. STARD 2015 pointers for reporting diagnostic accuracy research: rationalization and elaboration. BMJ Open 6, e012799 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sidey-Gibbons, J. A. M. & Sidey-Gibbons, C. J. Machine learning in drugs: a sensible introduction. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 19, 1–18 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfob, A. et al. Towards data-driven decision-making for breast cancer sufferers present process mastectomy and reconstruction: prediction of particular person patient-reported outcomes at two-year follow-up using machine learning. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 520–520 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfob, A. et al. Artificial intelligence to precisely determine breast cancer sufferers with a pathologic full response for omission of surgical procedure after neoadjuvant systemic remedy: a global multicenter evaluation. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 565–565 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolff, R. F. et al. PROBAST: a device to evaluate the danger of bias and applicability of prediction mannequin research. Ann. Intern. Med. 170, 51 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, J., Zhuang, Y. & Fong, S. The impression of data normalization on inventory market prediction: using SVM and technical indicators. in Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 652 72–88 (Springer, 2016).Singh, D. & Singh, B. Investigating the impression of data normalization on classification efficiency. Appl. Soft Comput. 97, 105524 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Douzas, G., Bacao, F. & Last, F. Improving imbalanced learning by a heuristic oversampling methodology primarily based on k-means and SMOTE. Inf. Sci. 465, 1–20 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, Okay. W., Hall, L. O. & Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling method. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002).Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Niu, A. & Cai, B. Big data analytics for advanced credit score danger evaluation of community lending primarily based on SMOTE algorithm. Complexity https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8563030 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bin, L. & Kai, H. Loan danger prediction methodology primarily based on SMOTE and XGBoost. Comput. Mod. 26 (2020).Ho, Okay. C. et al. Predicting discharge mortality after acute ischemic stroke using balanced data. AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2014, 1787–1796 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Resche-Rigon, M. & White, I. R. Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically lacking multilevel data. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 27, 1634–1649 (2018).Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Pfob, A. et al. Towards patient-centered decision-making in breast cancer surgical procedure: machine learning to foretell particular person patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up. Ann. Surg. (2020) (in Press).Sidey-Gibbons, C. J. et al. Development of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of economic toxicity in localized breast cancer following surgical therapy. JCO Clin. Cancer Inform. 5, 338–347 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Tibshirani, R. The lasso methodology for variable choice within the Cox mannequin. Stat. Med. 16, 385–395 (1997).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear fashions through coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, J. H. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347963 (1991).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Cortes, C. & Vapnik, V. Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. (1995).Haykin, S. Neural networks: a complete basis (1994).Rodríguez, J. D., Pérez, A. & Lozano, J. A. sensitivity evaluation of k-fold cross validation in prediction error estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 32, 569–575 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bergstra, J. & Bengio, Y. Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 281–305 (2012).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Brown, G. Ensemble learning. in Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (Springer Press, 2010).Galar, M., Fernandez, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H. & Herrera, F. A assessment on ensembles for the category imbalance drawback: bagging-, boosting-, and hybrid-based approaches. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 42, 463–484 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y. & Weinberger, Okay. Q. On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks. proceedings.mlr.press http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html (2017).Christakis, N. A., Smith, J. L., Parkes, C. M. & Lamont, E. B. Extent and determinants of error in docs’ prognoses in terminally sick sufferers: potential cohort examine Commentary: Why do docs overestimate? Commentary: Prognoses ought to be primarily based on proved indices not instinct. BMJ 320, 469–473 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lu, S. C. et al. Machine learning–primarily based short-term mortality prediction fashions for sufferers with cancer using digital well being file data: systematic assessment and essential appraisal. JMIR Med. Inf. 10, e33182 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Douzas, G., Bacao, F. & Last, F. Improving imbalanced learning by a heuristic oversampling methodology primarily based on k-means and SMOTE. Inform. Sci. 465, 1–20 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yap, B. W. et al. An software of oversampling, undersampling, bagging and boosting in dealing with imbalanced datasets. in Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering vol. 285 LNEE 13–22 (Springer, 2014).Gicić, A. & Subasi, A. Credit scoring for a microcredit data set using the artificial minority oversampling method and ensemble classifiers. Expert Syst. 36, e12363 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blagus, R. & Lusa, L. SMOTE for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data. BMC Bioinform. 14, 1–16 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Manz, C. R. et al. Validation of a machine learning algorithm to foretell 180-day mortality for outpatients with cancer. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.4331 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parikh, R. B. et al. Machine learning approaches to foretell 6-month mortality amongst sufferers with cancer. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e1915997 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Datta, A., Flynn, N. R. & Swamidass, S. J. Cal-Net: collectively learning classification and calibration on imbalanced binary classification duties. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN52387.2021.9534411 (2021).

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiMmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm5hdHVyZS5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZXMvczQxNTk4LTAyMi0yMjYxNC0x0gEA?oc=5

Recommended For You