As authorized professionals’ use of synthetic intelligence instruments is rising, so is their need for extra transparency and disclosures, even round utilizing the expertise in authorized analysis or translation, in accordance with Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner’s (BCLP) annual Arbitration Survey, which surveyed 221 respondents starting from legislation agency attorneys, in-house counsel, arbitrators, teachers and authorized expertise service suppliers.
Despite among the business’s considerations with consumer-grade generative AI instruments like ChatGPT, the survey, which was launched on Monday, discovered that about 28% of respondents had used ChatGPT in knowledgeable context, whether or not or not it’s for authorized analysis, authorized drafting, making ready summaries or nonlegal drafting duties equivalent to writing social media posts or press releases.
https://www.law.com/legaltechnews/2023/11/14/its-not-just-judges-that-want-mandatory-ai-disclosures/
