Moving towards vertically integrated artificial intelligence development

Zhang, J. et al. An interactive dashboard to trace themes, development maturity, and international fairness in medical artificial intelligence analysis. Lancet Digital Health 4, e212–e213 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pretnik, R. & Krotz, L. Healthcare AI 2020. https://klasresearch.com/report/healthcare-ai-2020-investment-continuesbut-results-slower-than-expected-a-decision-insights-report/1443 (2020).Rob, B. et al. Top of Mind for Top Health Systems. https://paddahealth.com/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/Top_of_Mind_for_Top_Health_Systems_2021_CCM_Reports_FINAL.pdf (2020).Balakrishnan, T., Chui, M., Hall, B. & Henke, N. The State of AI in 2020. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/quantumblack/ourinsights/global-survey-the-state-of-ai-in-2020 (2020).Lavender, J. Venture Pulse: Investment in AI for healthcare soars. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2018/04/venture-pulse-q1-18-globalanalysis-of-venture-funding.html (2018).Benjamens, S., Dhunnoo, P. & Meskó, B. The state of artificial intelligence-based FDA-approved medical units and algorithms: a web based database. npj Digit. Med. 3, 118 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, E. et al. How medical AI units are evaluated: Limitations and proposals from an evaluation of FDA approvals. Nat. Med. 27, 582–584 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lyell, D., Coiera, E., Chen, J., Shah, P. & Magrabi, F. How machine studying is embedded to help clinician resolution making: an evaluation of FDA-approved medical units. BMJ Health Care Inf. 28, e100301 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
McKinney, S. M. et al. International analysis of an AI system for breast most cancers screening. Nature 577, 89–94 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Freeman, Okay. et al. Use of artificial intelligence for picture evaluation in breast most cancers screening programmes: Systematic evaluation of take a look at accuracy. BMJ n1872. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1872 (2021).Nagendran, M. et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic evaluation of design, reporting requirements, and claims of deep studying research. BMJ m689. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m689 (2020).Aggarwal, R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of deep studying in medical imaging: A scientific evaluation and meta-analysis. npj Digit. Med. 4, 65 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shen, J. et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians in illness analysis: Systematic evaluation. JMIR Med. Inf. 7, e10010 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andrew Ng. MLOps: From model-centric to data-centric AI. https://www.deeplearning.ai/wpcontent/uploads/2021/06/MLOps-From-Model-centric-to-Data-centric-AI.pdf (2021).Lowe, D. Machine Learning Deserves Better Than This. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/machine-learning-deserves-better (2021).Navarro, C. L. A. et al. Risk of bias in research on prediction fashions developed utilizing supervised machine studying methods: Systematic evaluation. BMJ 375, n2281 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Wilkinson, J. et al. Time to actuality test the guarantees of machine learning-powered precision drugs. Lancet Digital Health 2, e677–e680 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Panch, T., Mattie, H. & Celi, L. A. The “inconvenient reality” about AI in healthcare. npj Digit. Med. 2, 77 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wawira Gichoya, J., McCoy, L. G., Celi, L. A. & Ghassemi, M. Equity in essence: a name for operationalising equity in machine studying for healthcare. BMJ Health Care Inf. 28, e100289 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
MI in Healthcare Workshop Working Group. Machine intelligence in healthcare—views on trustworthiness, explainability, usability, and transparency. npj Digit. Med. 3, 47 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beede, E. et al. A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy. in Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–12 (ACM,). https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376718 (2020).Strickland, E. IBM Watson, heal thyself: How IBM overpromised and underdelivered on AI well being care. IEEE Spectr. 56, 24–31 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wong, A. et al. External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Intern. Med. 181, 1065 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cam, A. Chui, M. & Hall, B. Global AI Survey: AI proves its price, however few scale influence. (2019).Rao, A. & Verweij, G. Global Artificial Intelligence Study: Exploiting the AI Revolution.Dang, Y., Lin, Q. & Huang, P. AIOps: Real-World Challenges and Research Innovations. In 2019 IEEE/ACM forty first International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) 4–5 (IEEE, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-Companion.2019.00023.Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G. & King, D. Key challenges for delivering medical influence with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 17, 195 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reddy, S. et al. Evaluation framework to information implementation of AI techniques into healthcare settings. BMJ Health Care Inf. 28, e100444 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gallifant, J. et al. Artificial intelligence for mechanical air flow: systematic evaluation of design, reporting requirements, and bias. British Journal of Anaesthesia S0007091221006206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.025 (2021).Collins, G. S. et al. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and danger of bias instrument (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction mannequin research primarily based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open 11, e048008 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sounderajah, V. et al. Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic take a look at accuracy research: the STARD-AI protocol. BMJ Open 11, e047709 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berisha, V. et al. Digital drugs and the curse of dimensionality. npj Digit. Med. 4, 153 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Futoma, J., Simons, M., Panch, T., Doshi-Velez, F. & Celi, L. A. The fable of generalisability in medical analysis and machine studying in well being care. Lancet Digital Health 2, e489–e492 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arnold, M. et al. Towards Automating the AI Operations Lifecycle. arXiv:2003.12808 [cs] (2020).Adamson, A. S. & Welch, H. G. Machine studying and the cancer-diagnosis drawback — No gold normal. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2285–2287 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolff, J., Pauling, J., Keck, A. & Baumbach, J. Systematic Review of Economic Impact Studies of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e16866 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. Best practices within the real-world information life cycle. PLOS Digit. Health 1, e0000003 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Budrionis, A. & Bellika, J. G. The studying healthcare system: Where are we now? A scientific evaluation. J. Biomed. Inform. 64, 87–92 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whebell, S. & Zhang, J. Bringing organic ARDS phenotypes to the bedside with machine-learning-based classifiers. Lancet Respiratory Med. 10, 319–320 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mali, S. A. et al. Making radiomics extra reproducible throughout scanner and imaging protocol variations: A evaluation of harmonization. Methods JPM 11, 842 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huser, V., Williams, N. D. & Mayer, C. S. Linking supplier specialty and outpatient diagnoses in medicare claims information: Data high quality implications. Appl Clin. Inf. 12, 729–736 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dakka, M. A. et al. Automated detection of poor-quality information: case research in healthcare. Sci. Rep. 11, 18005 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sholle, E. T. et al. Underserved populations with lacking race ethnicity information differ considerably from these with structured race/ethnicity documentation. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 26, 722–729 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maille, B. et al. Smartwatch electrocardiogram and artificial intelligence for assessing cardiac-rhythm security of drug remedy within the COVID-19 pandemic. The QT-logs research. Int. J. Cardiol. 331, 333–339 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kwon, J. et al. Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Smartwatch ECG for Heart Failure-Reduced Ejection Fraction Detection by Generating 12-Lead ECG. Diagnostics 12, 654 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, M. & McCool, B. P. Vertical integration: exploration of a well-liked strategic idea. Health Care Manag. Rev. 11, 7–19 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumpe, T. & Bolwijn, P. T. Manufacturing: The New Case for Vertical Integration. 8, 75 (1988).Mayo Clinic Platform. Mayo Clinic Platform: Products and Services. Mayo Clinic Platform https://www.mayoclinicplatform.org/products-and-services/ (2021).Murugadoss, Okay. et al. Building a best-in-class automated de-identification instrument for digital well being data by means of ensemble studying. Patterns 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100255 (2021).Hannah Mitchell. Mayo Clinic AI manufacturing facility has dozens of initiatives underway. Becker’s Hospital Review https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/innovation/mayo-clinic-ai-factory-has-dozens-of-projects-underway.html (2021).Yao, X. et al. Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiograms for identification of sufferers with low ejection fraction: a realistic, randomized medical trial. Nat. Med. 27, 815–819 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Giudicessi, J. R. et al. Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Assessment of the Heart Rate Corrected QT Interval Using a Mobile Electrocardiogram Device. Circulation 143, 1274–1286 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mahayni, A. A. et al. Electrocardiography-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Aids in Prediction of Long-term Mortality After Cardiac Surgery. Mayo Clin. Proc. 96, 3062–3070 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
McMurry, R. et al. Real-time evaluation of a mass vaccination effort confirms the security of FDA-authorized mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNtech. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2021.02.20.21252134 (2021).Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clinic: Emerging Capabilities within the Science of Artificial Intelligence. Mayoclinic.org https://www.mayoclinic.org/giving-to-mayo-clinic/our-priorities/artificial-intelligence (2021).Susan Barber Lindquist. Mayo Clinic Platform_Accelerate program begins with 4 AI startups. Mayo Clinic News Network https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/3-23-mayo-clinic-platform_accelerate-program-begins-with-four-ai-startups/ (2022).Nakisige, C., Schwartz, M. & Ndira, A. O. Cervical most cancers screening and therapy in Uganda. Gynecologic Oncol. Rep. 20, 37–40 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
William, W., Ware, A., Basaza-Ejiri, A. H. & Obungoloch, J. A evaluation of picture evaluation and machine studying methods for automated cervical most cancers screening from pap-smear photographs. Computer Methods Prog. Biomedicine 164, 15–22 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
William, W., Ware, A., Basaza-Ejiri, A. H. & Obungoloch, J. A pap-smear evaluation instrument (PAT) for detection of cervical most cancers from pap-smear photographs. BioMed. Eng. OnLine 18, 16 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
AIX-COVNET et al. Common pitfalls and proposals for utilizing machine studying to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 utilizing chest radiographs and CT scans. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 199–217 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wynants, L. et al. Prediction fashions for analysis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic evaluation and significant appraisal. BMJ m1328. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1328 (2020).Dan Bamford & Samantha Gan. NHS X – AI in Health and Care Award. (2020).Richard Torbett. Models of Access to Health Data within the UK. (2022).Rieke, N. et al. The way forward for digital well being with federated studying. npj Digit. Med. 3, 119 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
AI Centre for Value Based Healthcare. AI4VBH: Platforms. https://www.aicentre.co.uk/platforms#view2 (2022).US FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan. (2021).Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Software and AI as a Medical Device Change Programme. (2021).John, M. M., Olsson, H. H. & Bosch, J. Towards MLOps: A Framework and Maturity Model. in 2021 forty seventh Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) 1–8 (IEEE, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00050.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-022-00690-x

Recommended For You